Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: It's not for babies

  1. #1
    Inactive Member travelinman's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 19th, 2001
    Posts
    2,440
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    It seems some liberals are having a problem with the Carl Jr. add. After all fetuses are not human.

    http://www.adage.com/shared/includes...sjr-baby05.asf

  2. #2
    Sheriff jumper69's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13th, 2001
    Posts
    1,950
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Post

    What's wrong with it?

  3. #3
    Inactive Member travelinman's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 19th, 2001
    Posts
    2,440
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Post

    Originally posted by Jumper69:
    What's wrong with it?
    <font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well according to some of the liberal boards like Moveon and salon, their afraid it will help the right to life people because it shows a fetus as being a live baby.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •